1. There’s no scientific evidence that you can 'foster' curiosity as a trait – but you can create situations that prompt and guide a child’s curiosity.
‘I want to revise the thinking that someone can be a “more curious person,”’ Elizabeth says. Instead, she sees curiosity as a natural response to information. As such, a person’s baseline state of curiosity may not be malleable in and of itself. What educators and parents can foster are the specific contexts that provoke curiosity for certain kinds of information.
‘I want to distinguish this understanding of curiosity in a moment, a state of curiosity, versus something that is a human condition that’s going to exist regardless,’ Elizabeth says. Instead of trying to make kids ‘more curious,’ educators and parents should focus on creating moments that generate a curious response.
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
Young children have a sense of wonder and a natural curiosity about objects and events in their world. Through exploratory play and experimentation with objects and materials, they discover how to make their car go downhill faster or how to control the movement and flow of water. They are excited to find out what’s inside a pumpkin, how trees change over the year, how the rain feels and smells, and why pill bugs curl into a ball. The preschool environment nurtures children’s innate or natural dispositions to observe and seek information and guides their curiosity into opportunities to observe, explore, and inquire about objects and phenomena in their environment. Teachers provide children with a purposefully planned, play-based, supportive environment that expands their explorations. Children’s explorations and guided investigations deepen children’s understanding of concepts in science and develop their attitudes, skills, and language of scientific inquiry.
While investigating concepts from physical, life, and earth sciences, teachers encourage children to ask questions, to observe and investigate, to predict and experiment with objects and materials, to draw conclusions, to document their work, and to share their observations and ideas with others. Such experiences not only develop children’s scientific inquiry skills, but also provide the context for learning and developing their language (building vocabulary in English and in their home language), literacy, mathematics, and social skills. Science also offers a special avenue to include families in the curriculum and bridge the home and preschool cultures. Preschool science is inclusive and prepares children for the scientific skills and knowledge they encounter later in school. It fosters a joy of discovery, a positive approach to learning, and the development of skills and attitudes necessary for many areas of learning throughout life.
Pause to Reflect
What aspects of the natural world are you curious about? How might that affect how you plan curriculum for science?
References
Image by Seattle Parks is licensed by CC-BY-2.0
The California Preschool Curriculum Framework, Volume 3 by the California Department of Education is used with permission
This page titled 10.6: Conclusion is shared under a not declared license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Jennifer Paris, Kristin Beeve, & Clint Springer.
Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD,volume 34)
- The original version of this chapter was revised: Acknowledgement has been included at the end of the chapter. The correction to this chapter is available at //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72595-2_12
Curiosity and wonder are considered fundamental for children’s development. However, no precise definition of curiosity exists, and there is little research on the nature of curiosity. There is also a lack of knowledge and ideas about how pedagogy can sustain and stimulate curiosity. Drawing upon empirical material from semi-structured interviews with seven Early Childhood Teacher Education (ECTE) lecturers from the disciplines of mathematics, arts, literature, drama, pedagogy, science and physical education about their view of children’s curiosity, the authors aim to explore the lecturers’ understanding of children’s curiosity and how this understanding varies between disciplines. Children enact their curiosity in a cultural-historical context. The cultural-historical tradition of outdoor play is a part of the institution’s practices influencing the children, while the children may use curiosity to influence the content of these practices. Although the lecturers are from different disciplines, their understanding of curiosity were consistent, particularly with regards to their focus on bodily expressions of curiosity. Expanding the concept of curiosity, we suggest the term bodily curiosity to recognise and operationalise a sensory, active and embodied search for answers. Similarly, we suggest the term bodily wonder about a kind of embodied philosophising.Abstract
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Begus, K., & Southgate, V. (2012). Infant pointing serves an interrogative function. Developmental Science, 15(5), 611–617. //doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01160.x CrossRef Google Scholar Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 180–191. Google Scholar Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153, 25–33. CrossRef Google Scholar Chak, A. (2007). Teachers’ and parents’ conceptions of children’s curiosity and exploration. International Journal of Early Years Education, 15(2), 141–159. //doi.org/10.1080/09669760701288690 CrossRef Google Scholar Chak, A. (2010). Adult response to children’s exploratory behaviours: An exploratory study. Early Child Development and Care, 180(5), 633–646. CrossRef Google Scholar Cohen, M. X., Schone-Bake, J., Elger, C. E., & Weber, B. (2009). Connectivity-based segregation of the human striatum predicts personality characteristics. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 32–34. CrossRef Google Scholar Coie, J. D. (1974). An evaluation of the cross-situational stability of children’s curiosity. Journal of Personality, 42(1), 93–116. CrossRef Google Scholar Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Downloaded from: Globalgreybooks.com 20.08.2019. Google Scholar Egan, K., Cant, A., & Judson, G. (2014). Wonder-full education: The centrality of wonder in teaching and learning across the curriculum. New York: Routledge.References
Google Scholar
Ejbye-Ernst, N. (2011). Pædagogers formidling af naturen i naturbørnehaver. PhD dissertation, Aarhus University.
Google Scholar
Engel, S. (2009). Is curiosity vanishing? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(8), 777–779.
Google Scholar
Engel, S. (2015). The hungry mind. The origins of curiosity in early childhood. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Fleer, M., & Pramling, N. (2014). A cultural-historical study of children learning science. Dordrecht, the Netherlands/New York: Springer.
Google Scholar
Gauvain, M., Munroe, R. L., & Beebe, H. (2013). Children’s questions in cross-cultural perspective: A four-culture study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(7), 1148–1165.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D., & Ranganath, C. (2014). States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit. Neuron, 84(2), 486–496. //doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.060
CrossRef Google Scholar
Gurholt, K. P., & Sanderud, J. R. (2016). Curious play: Children’s exploration of nature. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(4), 318–329.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Gustavsson, L., & Pramling, N. (2014). The educational nature of different ways teachers communicate with children about natural phenomena. International Journal of Early Years Education, 1–14.
Google Scholar
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2005). Romantic understanding and science education. Teaching Education, 16(1), 23–32.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2014). Reclaiming the value of wonder in science education. In K. Egan, A. Cant, & G. Judson (Eds.), Wonder-full education: The centrality of wonder in teaching and learning across the curriculum. New York/London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Hammer, A. S. E. (2012). Undervisning i barnehagen. In E. E. Ødegaard (Ed.), Barnehagen som danningsarena. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (2012). Trusting what you’re told: How children learn from others. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Hauge, K. H., & Heggen, M. P. (2019). Tverrfaglighet i norsk barnehagelærerutdanning – et forslag til begrepsavklaring. Nordic Studies in Education, 39, 249–263.
Google Scholar
Hodgkin, R. A. (1976). Born curious: new perspectives in educational theory. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. //doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
CrossRef Google Scholar
Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2012). Children’s scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review, 32(2), 125–160.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Kashdan, T. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2005). Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge (Oxford handbook of positive psychology, 2009).
Google Scholar
Lindholm, M. (2018). Promoting curiosity? Possibilities and pitfalls in science education. Science & Education, 27, 987–1002.
Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological bulletin, 116(1), 75–98. //doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
CrossRef Google Scholar
Luce, M. R., & Hsi, S. (2015). Science-relevant curiosity expression and interest in science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 99(1), 70–97.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Lynngård, A. M. (2015). På jakt etter naturfag i natur- og friluftsbarnehagen. In B. O. Hallås & G. Karlsen (Eds.), Natur og danning. Profesjonsutøvelse, barnehage og skole. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
Google Scholar
Menning, S. F. (2017). Tracing curiosity with a value perspective. Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk og kritikk, 3(1), 1–16. //doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v3.531
CrossRef Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2013). Phenomenology of perception. London/New York: Routledge.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Milne, I. (2010). A sense of wonder, arising from aesthetic experiences, should be the starting point for inquiry in primary science. Science Education International, 21(2), 102–115.
Google Scholar
Ministry of Education and Research. (2017). Rammeplan for barnehagen. Oslo, Norway: Utdanningsdirektoratet. Retrieved from //www.udir.no/globalassets/filer/barnehage/rammeplan/framework-plan-for-kindergartens2-2017.pdf
O’Neill, D. K., Main, R. M., & Ziemski, R. A. (2009). ‘I like Barney’: Preschoolers’ spontaneous conversational initiations with peers. First Language, 29(4), 401–425. //doi.org/10.1177/0142723709105315
CrossRef Google Scholar
Opdal, P. M. (2001). Curiosity, wonder and education seen as perspective development. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20, 331–344.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Patrick, H., & Mantzicopoulos, P. (2015). Young children’s motivation for learning science. In K. Cabe Trundle & M. Saçkes (Eds.), Research in early childhood science education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Sanderud, J. R., & Gurholt, K. P. (2014). Barns nysgjerrige lek i natur – Utforskende dannelse. Nordic Studies in Education, (1).
Google Scholar
Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2009). Conceptualising progression in the pedagogy of play and sustained shared thinking in early childhood education: A Vygotskian perspective. Education and Child Psychology, 26(2), 77–89.
Google Scholar
Thulin, S. (2011). Lærares tal och barns nyfikenhet: Kommunikation om naturvetenskapliga innhåll i førskolan. PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg.
Google Scholar
Van Schijndel, T. J. P., Franse, R. K., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2010). The exploratory behavior scale: Assessing young visitors’ hands-on behavior in science museums. Science Education, 94(5), 794–809. //doi.org/10.1002/sce.20394
CrossRef Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, UK/London: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Download references
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from The Research Council of Norway (project code 275575), Kindergarten Knowledge Centre for Systemic Research on Diversity and Sustainable Futures (KINDknow) and Western Norway University of Applied Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
KINDknow, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norge
Marianne Presthus Heggen & Anne Myklebust Lynngård
Authors
- Marianne Presthus Heggen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
- Anne Myklebust Lynngård
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Marianne Presthus Heggen .
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
KINDknow Kindergarten Knowledge Centre for Systemic Research on Diversity and Sustainable Futures, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
Liv Torunn Grindheim
VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark
Hanne Værum Sørensen
Institute of Education and Humanities, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Carmarthen, UK
Angela Rekers
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (//creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Reprints and Permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heggen, M.P., Lynngård, A.M. (2021). Curious Curiosity – Reflections on How Early Childhood Lecturers Perceive Children’s Curiosity. In: Grindheim, L.T., Sørensen, H.V., Rekers, A. (eds) Outdoor Learning and Play. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 34. Springer, Cham. //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72595-2_11