Which of the following most likely describes the fate of the golkonda state after 1650 ?

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year

Log in through your institution

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $34.00 USD.

How does it work?

  1. Select the purchase option.
  2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
  3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

journal article

At Empire's End: The Nizam, Hyderabad and Eighteenth-Century India

Modern Asian Studies

Vol. 43, No. 1, Expanding Frontiers in South Asian and World History: Essays in Honour of John F. Richards (Jan., 2009)

, pp. 5-43 (39 pages)

Published By: Cambridge University Press

https://www.jstor.org/stable/20488070

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Alternate access options

For independent researchers

Read Online

Read 100 articles/month free

Subscribe to JPASS

Unlimited reading + 10 downloads

Purchase article

$34.00 - Download now and later

Abstract

Nizam-ul-Mulk (d. 1748) was a Mughal nobleman who founded the post-Mughal successor state of Hyderabad. Engaging the Nizam's long and varied career, this essay re-evaluates the Nizam's decision to abandon the Mughal imperial system. In so doing, it highlights the ways in which the Nizam's story contrasts with that of founders of other post-Mughal successor states. This essay also seeks to explore Hyderabad's early history, the unique challenges faced by the new state, and the inventive ways in which it sought to overcome them. Ultimately, this essay aims to broaden and complicate our understanding of India's political history in the late-seventeenth and early-eighteenth century.

Journal Information

Modern Asian Studies promotes an understanding of contemporary Asia and its rich inheritance. Covering South Asia, South-East Asia, China, and Japan, this quarterly journal publishes original research articles concerned with the history, geography, politics, sociology, literature, economics, social anthropology and culture of the area. It specialises in the longer monographic essay based on archival materials and new field work. Its expanded book review section offers detailed and in-depth analysis of recent literature. Instructions for Contributors at Cambridge Journals Online

Publisher Information

Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world’s leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries. Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit http://journals.cambridge.org.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Modern Asian Studies © 2009 Cambridge University Press
Request Permissions

Source 2Ms E-14, from a Moraqqa (gouache on paper), Indian School, (17th century) / Institute of Oriental Studies, St. Petersburg, Russia / Giraudon /Bridgeman ImagesSayings attributed to Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikhism, circa 1500 C.E.• “Oh God, the tongue of man has given Thee numerous names; but ‘the Truth’ is Thy real name from timeimmemorial.”• “We human beings are neither Hindus nor Muslims; but are bodies and soul of the Supreme Being; call HimAllah, or call Him Rama.”• “Everyone is chanting: ‘Rama, Rama’; but mere repetition is no remembrance of Rama. Only when the heart ofman becomes saturated with God is such remembrance fruitful.”• “Worthless is caste and worthless an exalted name; for all humankind there is but a single refuge in God.”

Who destroyed Golconda fort?

Even a massive fortification of granite was also built around an area of 5km to have a powerful grip over the security aspect of this place. And it was in the year of 1687, that this fort saw its final ruin by the hands of the Mughal ruler, Aurangzeb.

Which is the state of Golconda fort?

Telangana

Who annexed Golconda in Mughal Empire?

Golconda Sultanate The dynasty ruled for 171 years until the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb's army conquered Golkonda in 1687.

Where is Golconda fort situated *?

Golconda Fort is located in the western part of Hyderabad city and is about 9 km from the Hussain Sagar Lake. The outer fort occupies an area of three square kilometers, which is 4.8 kilometers in length. It was originally known as Mankal, and built on a hilltop in the year 1143.