SSD Adata XPG SX8200 Pro là một biến thể có dung lượng 1TB để lưu trữ nhiều dữ liệu hơn. Hiệu suất cao mà Adata XPG SX8200 Pro mang lại không thể tách rời sự hỗ trợ dành cho chip flash Intel / Micron 64L 3D TLC cùng với bộ điều khiển có khả năng từ Silicon Motion SM2262EN. Show  Intel giới thiệu dòng Pro 1500 series, như phiên bản OEM của các hãng khác, thiết kế bao bì đóng gói đơn giản, không cầu kì để giảm chi phí, nhưng vẫn được trang bị những tính năng cao cấp. SSD Intel Pro 1500 180GB như một bản nâng cấp về dòng OEM của hãng, vẫn NAND MLC, controller SandForce nhìn hao hao thành phần trong Intel 530, với tốc độ lên 530mb / 490mb kèm Nand MLC đem lại sự bền ổn của Intel. Bảng so sánh hiệu năng SSD Intel Pro 1500 180gb 2.5 inchSSD Pro 1500 SSD 530 SSD 520 SSD 335 SSD 330 Chip xử lý LSI SandForce SF-2281 NAND Intel 20nm MLC Intel 20nm MLC Intel 25nm MLC Intel 20nm MLC Intel 25nm MLC Dung lượng (GB) 80/120/180/240/360/480 80/180/240/360 60/120/180/240/480 180/240 60/120/180/240 Chuẩn kết nối 2.5″ 7mm SATA M.2 2242 (80GB only) M.2 2280 (up to 360GB) 2.5″ 7mm SATA M.2 2280 (80/180/360) 2.5″ 7mm & 9.5mm SATA 2.5″ 9.5mm SATA 2.5″ 9.5mm SATA Tốc độ đọc 540 MB/s 540 MB/s 550 MB/s 500 MB/s 500 MB/s Tốc độ ghi 490 MB/s 490 MB/s 520 MB/s 450 MB/s 450 MB/s Tốc độ đọc ngẫu nhiên 41K IOPS 41K IOPS 50K IOPS 42K IOPS 42K IOPS Tốc độ ghi ngẫu nhiên 80K IOPS 80K IOPS 80K IOPS 52K IOPS 52K IOPS AES-256 Có Có Không Không Không TCG Opal Có Không Không Không Không Intel vPro/SCS Có Không Không Không Không Power (Active) 140 mW (M.2) 195 mW (2.5″) 140 mW (M.2) 195 mW (2.5″) 850 mW 350 mW 350 mW Power (Idle) 55 mW (M.2) 125 mW (2.5″) 55 mW (M.2) 125 mW (2.5″) 600 mW 275 mW 275 mW Power (DevSleep) 200 µW (M.2) 5 mW (2.5″) 200 µW (M.2) 5 mW (2.5″) – – – Bạn cũng có thể tham khảo các sản phẩm SSD Intel chuẩn SATA iii 2.5 Inch khác tại mục SSD Intel của Lagihitech When we get your report, we'll check if the review meets our Community guidelines. If it doesn't, we'll remove it. Sorry we couldn't load the review Thank you for your feedback Sorry, there was an errorPlease try again later.
Top reviews from the United StatesThere was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2020 The drive installed perfectly and does exactly what it's supposed to do. Great storage expansion for $25. Recommended Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2019 I do not know if this is a single lemon or a bad tree. I am very disappointed with my unit. The unit I received appeared to be a refurbished unit, although it isn’t labeled as such. I’ve tried using it with 3 different USB 3.1 to SATA III adaptors, and on a SATA III interface on 2 separate desktops. I never got it to be seen by Windows 10 Pro or by Linux. For the record these interfaces worked with Samsung and WD Blue SSDs. This is my first 1500 Pro SSD. My experience in the past was very good so this failure is even more disappointing. Reviewed in the United States on April 1, 2015 Really, really slow for an SSD. According to Crystal Disk: Read: 240 MB, Write: 168 MB. Really awful performance for an SSD. Don't buy! 4 people found this helpful Report Reviewed in the United States on July 24, 2019 Hey, after seeing the reviews on this after encountering a used one, I wanted to bring actual benchmarks along with a comparison with what you'd get in a typical 2019 budget 240GB SATA SSD. In this case, one from MC, the Inland 240GB SATA SSD. You will see the two images I've attached, the first being this model Intel Pro 1500 240GB, the second being the Inland. Of course these days it would make the most sense to buy the new budget model, new warranty, etc. I figured this information would be useful to show that in practical terms, there is no difference in end-user performance for a daily-use PC. Things like running lots of browser tabs, running Outlook with large email accounts, loading games, installing/uninstalling apps, running Windows updates, the performance is going to be so similar as to need benchmarks to really see much of a difference. If you have a newer system, be sure to check if it is capable of running the M.2 nVME solid state drives. These have much higher performance potential than is possible with SATA ports. If you have a system that DOES have an M.2 slot, but can only run M.2 SATA SSDs, then don't worry, there is no difference other than form factor in choosing 2.5" SATA vs M.2 SATA SSDs. Further, if you have a system with purely SATA ports, check your model/manual/documentation to make sure you connect any SSDs to available 6.0Gbps ports AKA SATA-3. The drive will function fine on Sata 3Gbps AKA SATA-2, or even original Sata 1.5Gbps AKA SATA-1, but performance and features will be limited. Running on SATA-3 with a modern OS will ensure the best performance and durability of your SATA SSD, as things like TRIM and optimized cache access are limited with older SATA ports and/or operating systems. This test system as used in the screen grabs is an Intel DQ77 Mainboard, 8GB DDR3 1600, running Windows 10 x64 v1903 with current updates on an i7-3770 CPU. I hope this information is helpful to someone. 4.0 out of 5 stars Respectable older SSD - Review with comparison with newer budget 240GB model Reviewed in the United States on July 24, 2019 Hey, after seeing the reviews on this after encountering a used one, I wanted to bring actual benchmarks along with a comparison with what you'd get in a typical 2019 budget 240GB SATA SSD. In this case, one from MC, the Inland 240GB SATA SSD. You will see the two images I've attached, the first being this model Intel Pro 1500 240GB, the second being the Inland. Of course these days it would make the most sense to buy the new budget model, new warranty, etc. I figured this information would be useful to show that in practical terms, there is no difference in end-user performance for a daily-use PC. Things like running lots of browser tabs, running Outlook with large email accounts, loading games, installing/uninstalling apps, running Windows updates, the performance is going to be so similar as to need benchmarks to really see much of a difference. If you have a newer system, be sure to check if it is capable of running the M.2 nVME solid state drives. These have much higher performance potential than is possible with SATA ports. If you have a system that DOES have an M.2 slot, but can only run M.2 SATA SSDs, then don't worry, there is no difference other than form factor in choosing 2.5" SATA vs M.2 SATA SSDs. Further, if you have a system with purely SATA ports, check your model/manual/documentation to make sure you connect any SSDs to available 6.0Gbps ports AKA SATA-3. The drive will function fine on Sata 3Gbps AKA SATA-2, or even original Sata 1.5Gbps AKA SATA-1, but performance and features will be limited. Running on SATA-3 with a modern OS will ensure the best performance and durability of your SATA SSD, as things like TRIM and optimized cache access are limited with older SATA ports and/or operating systems. This test system as used in the screen grabs is an Intel DQ77 Mainboard, 8GB DDR3 1600, running Windows 10 x64 v1903 with current updates on an i7-3770 CPU. I hope this information is helpful to someone. Images in this review 3 people found this helpful Report Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2017 I can't say anything bad about Intel SSD's. I've installed at least 10 and have yet to see one fail. Reviewed in the United States on March 26, 2017 everything was as adevertised Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2017 Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2016 I worked with many HP laptops that came with this drive, and all of them had very fast and excellent performance. |
