Hiệu suất tính toán lý thuyết của đơn vị đồ họa bên trong của bộ xử lý với độ chính xác đơn giản (32 bit) trong GFLOPS. GFLOPS cho biết iGPU có thể thực hiện bao nhiêu tỷ thao tác dấu phẩy động mỗi giây. Show Estimated results for PassMark CPU MarkMột số CPU được liệt kê dưới đây đã được điểm chuẩn bởi CPU-Benchmark. Tuy nhiên, phần lớn CPU chưa được kiểm tra và kết quả được ước tính bằng công thức độc quyền bí mật của CPU-Benchmark. Do đó, chúng không phản ánh chính xác các giá trị nhãn Passmark CPU thực tế và không được xác nhận bởi PassMark Software Pty Ltd. Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)Geekbench 3 là một điểm chuẩn plattform chéo sử dụng nhiều bộ nhớ hệ thống. Trí nhớ nhanh sẽ đẩy kết quả lên rất nhiều. Bài kiểm tra lõi đơn chỉ sử dụng một lõi CPU, số lượng lõi hoặc khả năng siêu phân luồng không được tính. Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)Geekbench 3 là một điểm chuẩn plattform chéo sử dụng nhiều bộ nhớ hệ thống. Trí nhớ nhanh sẽ đẩy kết quả lên rất nhiều. Bài kiểm tra đa lõi liên quan đến tất cả các lõi CPU và đánh dấu một lợi thế lớn của siêu phân luồng. Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)Cinebench 11.5 dựa trên Cinema 4D Suite, một phần mềm phổ biến để tạo biểu mẫu và các nội dung khác ở dạng 3D. Bài kiểm tra đa lõi liên quan đến tất cả các lõi CPU và đánh dấu một lợi thế lớn của siêu phân luồng. AMD has been taking a beating lately; when Intel released its Core 2 microprocessor family it was priced and performed aggressively, too aggressively for AMD to adequately compete with at the time. AMD's marketing even went into remission as reviewers weren't even seeded for speed bumps to the Athlon 64 X2 line, the X2 5000+ and FX-62 were the fastest Socket-AM2 parts AMD sent out for review and they were the first ones we'd ever reviewed as well. Sometimes no PR is good PR, and an article around the launch of the Athlon 64 X2 5200+, 5400+ or 5600+ simply proclaiming that Core 2 is once again on top would only work in Intel's favor. Quad FX came and went with limited interest from the enthusiast community, but the new platform signified a change in AMD's product lineup. Expensive FX series processors would no longer be simply speed bumps of mainstream CPUs with more cache, they would be reserved for a completely different socket as well and sold in bundles of two for Quad FX platforms. It's almost fitting that the FX line has been relegated to a platform that we didn't recommend as it makes the task of encouraging users to stay away from FX-class processors a little easier. And if having to move to a new socket wasn't reason enough to pick an AM2 processor over its FX counterpart, AMD's latest price cuts should seal the deal: CPU Clock Speed L2 Cache Price AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz 1MBx2 $459 AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 2.8GHz 1MBx2 $326 AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+ 2.8GHz 512KBx2 $267 AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 2.6GHz 1MBx2 $232 AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2.6GHz 512KBx2 $222 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 2.5GHz 512KBx2 $217 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 2.4GHz 512KBx2 $195 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 2.3GHz 512KBx2 $170 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 2.2GHz 512KBx2 $159 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 2.1GHz 512KBx2 $144 AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 2.0GHz 512KBx2 $113 AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ 1.9GHz 512KBx2 $102 The most expensive Athlon 64 X2, in fact the one being introduced today, is priced at under $500. Clocked at 3.0GHz with a 1MB L2 cache per core, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ isn't even the most attractive part of AMD's lineup. Shave 200MHz off the 6000+ and you get the Athlon 64 X2 5600+, priced at $326. Note that the X2 5600+ is simply a FX-62 in disguise, what used to be a $999 processor has been reduced to less than a third of its cost - ain't competition grand? Of course a price war isn't in AMD's best interest when it comes to making money, but it's the best AMD can do until its new micro-architecture makes its debut later this year. As a reference, below is a table of Intel's Core 2 price list: CPU Clock Speed L2 Cache Price Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 2.93GHz 4MB $999 Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 2.66GHz 4MB $530 Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 2.40GHz 4MB $316 Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 2.13GHz 2MB $224 Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 1.86GHz 2MB $183 Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 1.80GHz 2MB $163 The Core 2 Duo E6700 is $70 more expensive than the X2 6000+ but it is Intel's closest competition to the new AMD processor. The E6600 lines up pretty well with the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ at a price $10 lower, while the E6400 is only $2 away from the X2 5000+. While we know that Intel's Core 2 processors are faster, the question that remains is whether AMD's aggressive pricing changes the value equation at all. Still 90nmDespite AMD's recent move to 65nm, the highest clocked cores are still built on a 90nm process; this is usually the case when a new process isn't mature enough to produce adequate yields at higher clock speeds. There's also the fact that higher volume processors run at lower clock speeds so it makes sense for a capacity constrained company like AMD to move high volume parts to 65nm production before the lower demand SKUs. |
