Building on childrens natural inquiry investigation curiosity and exploration

1. There’s no scientific evidence that you can 'foster' curiosity as a trait – but you can create situations that prompt and guide a child’s curiosity.

‘I want to revise the thinking that someone can be a “more curious person,”’ Elizabeth says. Instead, she sees curiosity as a natural response to information. As such, a person’s baseline state of curiosity may not be malleable in and of itself. What educators and parents can foster are the specific contexts that provoke curiosity for certain kinds of information.

‘I want to distinguish this understanding of curiosity in a moment, a state of curiosity, versus something that is a human condition that’s going to exist regardless,’ Elizabeth says. Instead of trying to make kids ‘more curious,’ educators and parents should focus on creating moments that generate a curious response.

\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

Young children have a sense of wonder and a natural curiosity about objects and events in their world. Through exploratory play and experimentation with objects and materials, they discover how to make their car go downhill faster or how to control the movement and flow of water. They are excited to find out what’s inside a pumpkin, how trees change over the year, how the rain feels and smells, and why pill bugs curl into a ball. The preschool environment nurtures children’s innate or natural dispositions to observe and seek information and guides their curiosity into opportunities to observe, explore, and inquire about objects and phenomena in their environment. Teachers provide children with a purposefully planned, play-based, supportive environment that expands their explorations. Children’s explorations and guided investigations deepen children’s understanding of concepts in science and develop their attitudes, skills, and language of scientific inquiry.

Building on childrens natural inquiry investigation curiosity and exploration
Figure 10.7: Capturing documentation of the worm this child found while exploring outside.

While investigating concepts from physical, life, and earth sciences, teachers encourage children to ask questions, to observe and investigate, to predict and experiment with objects and materials, to draw conclusions, to document their work, and to share their observations and ideas with others. Such experiences not only develop children’s scientific inquiry skills, but also provide the context for learning and developing their language (building vocabulary in English and in their home language), literacy, mathematics, and social skills. Science also offers a special avenue to include families in the curriculum and bridge the home and preschool cultures. Preschool science is inclusive and prepares children for the scientific skills and knowledge they encounter later in school. It fosters a joy of discovery, a positive approach to learning, and the development of skills and attitudes necessary for many areas of learning throughout life.

Pause to Reflect

What aspects of the natural world are you curious about? How might that affect how you plan curriculum for science?

References

Image by Seattle Parks is licensed by CC-BY-2.0

The California Preschool Curriculum Framework, Volume 3 by the California Department of Education is used with permission


This page titled 10.6: Conclusion is shared under a not declared license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Jennifer Paris, Kristin Beeve, & Clint Springer.

Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD,volume 34)

  • The original version of this chapter was revised: Acknowledgement has been included at the end of the chapter. The correction to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72595-2_12

Abstract

Curiosity and wonder are considered fundamental for children’s development. However, no precise definition of curiosity exists, and there is little research on the nature of curiosity. There is also a lack of knowledge and ideas about how pedagogy can sustain and stimulate curiosity. Drawing upon empirical material from semi-structured interviews with seven Early Childhood Teacher Education (ECTE) lecturers from the disciplines of mathematics, arts, literature, drama, pedagogy, science and physical education about their view of children’s curiosity, the authors aim to explore the lecturers’ understanding of children’s curiosity and how this understanding varies between disciplines. Children enact their curiosity in a cultural-historical context. The cultural-historical tradition of outdoor play is a part of the institution’s practices influencing the children, while the children may use curiosity to influence the content of these practices. Although the lecturers are from different disciplines, their understanding of curiosity were consistent, particularly with regards to their focus on bodily expressions of curiosity. Expanding the concept of curiosity, we suggest the term bodily curiosity to recognise and operationalise a sensory, active and embodied search for answers. Similarly, we suggest the term bodily wonder about a kind of embodied philosophising.

Keywords

  • Curiosity
  • Bodily curiosity
  • Bodily wonder
  • Cultural conditions for curiosity
  • ECE

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Begus, K., & Southgate, V. (2012). Infant pointing serves an interrogative function. Developmental Science, 15(5), 611–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01160.x

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 180–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153, 25–33.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chak, A. (2007). Teachers’ and parents’ conceptions of children’s curiosity and exploration. International Journal of Early Years Education, 15(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760701288690

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chak, A. (2010). Adult response to children’s exploratory behaviours: An exploratory study. Early Child Development and Care, 180(5), 633–646.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. X., Schone-Bake, J., Elger, C. E., & Weber, B. (2009). Connectivity-based segregation of the human striatum predicts personality characteristics. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 32–34.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D. (1974). An evaluation of the cross-situational stability of children’s curiosity. Journal of Personality, 42(1), 93–116.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Downloaded from: Globalgreybooks.com 20.08.2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, K., Cant, A., & Judson, G. (2014). Wonder-full education: The centrality of wonder in teaching and learning across the curriculum. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejbye-Ernst, N. (2011). Pædagogers formidling af naturen i naturbørnehaver. PhD dissertation, Aarhus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S. (2009). Is curiosity vanishing? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(8), 777–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S. (2015). The hungry mind. The origins of curiosity in early childhood. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M., & Pramling, N. (2014). A cultural-historical study of children learning science. Dordrecht, the Netherlands/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauvain, M., Munroe, R. L., & Beebe, H. (2013). Children’s questions in cross-cultural perspective: A four-culture study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(7), 1148–1165.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D., & Ranganath, C. (2014). States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit. Neuron, 84(2), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.060

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gurholt, K. P., & Sanderud, J. R. (2016). Curious play: Children’s exploration of nature. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(4), 318–329.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, L., & Pramling, N. (2014). The educational nature of different ways teachers communicate with children about natural phenomena. International Journal of Early Years Education, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2005). Romantic understanding and science education. Teaching Education, 16(1), 23–32.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2014). Reclaiming the value of wonder in science education. In K. Egan, A. Cant, & G. Judson (Eds.), Wonder-full education: The centrality of wonder in teaching and learning across the curriculum. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, A. S. E. (2012). Undervisning i barnehagen. In E. E. Ødegaard (Ed.), Barnehagen som danningsarena. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L. (2012). Trusting what you’re told: How children learn from others. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauge, K. H., & Heggen, M. P. (2019). Tverrfaglighet i norsk barnehagelærerutdanning – et forslag til begrepsavklaring. Nordic Studies in Education, 39, 249–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin, R. A. (1976). Born curious: new perspectives in educational theory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2012). Children’s scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review, 32(2), 125–160.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2005). Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge (Oxford handbook of positive psychology, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm, M. (2018). Promoting curiosity? Possibilities and pitfalls in science education. Science & Education, 27, 987–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological bulletin, 116(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, M. R., & Hsi, S. (2015). Science-relevant curiosity expression and interest in science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 99(1), 70–97.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lynngård, A. M. (2015). På jakt etter naturfag i natur- og friluftsbarnehagen. In B. O. Hallås & G. Karlsen (Eds.), Natur og danning. Profesjonsutøvelse, barnehage og skole. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menning, S. F. (2017). Tracing curiosity with a value perspective. Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk og kritikk, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v3.531

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2013). Phenomenology of perception. London/New York: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, I. (2010). A sense of wonder, arising from aesthetic experiences, should be the starting point for inquiry in primary science. Science Education International, 21(2), 102–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Research. (2017). Rammeplan for barnehagen. Oslo, Norway: Utdanningsdirektoratet. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/globalassets/filer/barnehage/rammeplan/framework-plan-for-kindergartens2-2017.pdf

  • O’Neill, D. K., Main, R. M., & Ziemski, R. A. (2009). ‘I like Barney’: Preschoolers’ spontaneous conversational initiations with peers. First Language, 29(4), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723709105315

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Opdal, P. M. (2001). Curiosity, wonder and education seen as perspective development. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20, 331–344.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, H., & Mantzicopoulos, P. (2015). Young children’s motivation for learning science. In K. Cabe Trundle & M. Saçkes (Eds.), Research in early childhood science education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderud, J. R., & Gurholt, K. P. (2014). Barns nysgjerrige lek i natur – Utforskende dannelse. Nordic Studies in Education, (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2009). Conceptualising progression in the pedagogy of play and sustained shared thinking in early childhood education: A Vygotskian perspective. Education and Child Psychology, 26(2), 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thulin, S. (2011). Lærares tal och barns nyfikenhet: Kommunikation om naturvetenskapliga innhåll i førskolan. PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Schijndel, T. J. P., Franse, R. K., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2010). The exploratory behavior scale: Assessing young visitors’ hands-on behavior in science museums. Science Education, 94(5), 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20394

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, UK/London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from The Research Council of Norway (project code 275575), Kindergarten Knowledge Centre for Systemic Research on Diversity and Sustainable Futures (KINDknow) and Western Norway University of Applied Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. KINDknow, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norge

    Marianne Presthus Heggen & Anne Myklebust Lynngård

Authors

  1. Marianne Presthus Heggen

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Myklebust Lynngård

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne Presthus Heggen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. KINDknow Kindergarten Knowledge Centre for Systemic Research on Diversity and Sustainable Futures, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway

    Liv Torunn Grindheim

  2. VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark

    Hanne Værum Sørensen

  3. Institute of Education and Humanities, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Carmarthen, UK

    Angela Rekers

Rights and permissions

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Reprints and Permissions

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heggen, M.P., Lynngård, A.M. (2021). Curious Curiosity – Reflections on How Early Childhood Lecturers Perceive Children’s Curiosity. In: Grindheim, L.T., Sørensen, H.V., Rekers, A. (eds) Outdoor Learning and Play. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72595-2_11

How can you model creativity thoughtfulness and curiosity needed for exploration discovery and investigation?

Adults can model creativity, thoughtfulness, and curiosity that is necessary for exploration. By showing their own interests in materials and experiences, adults can teach children about the value of exploration. Discoveries, investigations, and experiments can be related to a wide variety of areas or concepts.

Why is it important for children to explore and investigate?

Exploring also gives toddlers a chance to work on important motor skills. Whether it's kicking a ball or climbing stairs, they can persist until they get it right. Doing so not only adds skills, it boosts their sense of confidence and competence. In other words, they begin to think: "I can do it!"

How can you encourage curiosity and discovery in the classroom?

Practical Tips to Inspire Curiosity in Students.
Be Curious Yourself. Model an open, inquisitive attitude to new and familiar activities, ideas, people, and cultures. ... .
Ask Questions and Question Answers. ... .
Practice and Encourage Active Listening. ... .
Look for the Hook. ... .
Present New Information in Chunks..

How can we encourage children to explore their environment?

Top Ten: Ways to Teach Kids About the Environment.
Lead by example. ... .
Take your kids outside. ... .
Teach children to use the appropriate receptacle for their waste: reduce, reduce, reduce, reuse, reuse and recycle as much as you can. ... .
Give them chores, like helping you classify your recyclables..