Perspective taking differs from empathy in which way?

1. Titchener EB. Introspection and empathy. Dialogues Philos Ment Neuro Sci. (2014) 7:25–30. [Google Scholar]

2. de Vignemont F, Singer T. The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends Cogn Sci. (2006) 10:435–41. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Kanske P. The social mind: disentangling affective and cognitive routes to understanding others. Interdiscip Sci Rev. (2018) 43:115–24. 10.1080/03080188.2018.1453243 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Paulus FM, Müller-Pinzler L, Westermann S, Krach S. On the distinction of empathic and vicarious emotions. Front Hum Neurosci. (2013) 7:196. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00196 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Kanske P, Böckler A, Singer T. Models, mechanisms and moderators dissociating empathy and theory of mind. In: Wöhr M., Krach S., editors. Social Behavior From Rodents to Humans: Neural Foundations and Clinical Implications Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing. (2017). p. 193–206. 10.1007/7854_2015_412 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Paulus FM, Müller-Pinzler L, Stolz DS, Mayer AV, Rademacher L, Krach S. Laugh or cringe? Common and distinct processes of reward-based schadenfreude and empathy-based fremdscham. Neuropsychologia. (2018) 116:52–60. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.030 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Steinbeis N, Bernhardt BC, Singer T. Age-related differences in function and structure of rSMG and reduced functional connectivity with DLPFC explains heightened emotional egocentricity bias in childhood. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. (2015) 10:302–10. 10.1093/scan/nsu057 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Lamm C, Decety J, Singer T. Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. NeuroImage. (2011) 54:2492–502. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Lamm C, Silani G, Singer T. Distinct neural networks underlying empathy for pleasant and unpleasant touch. Cortex J Devoted Study Nerv Syst Behav. (2015) 70:79–89. 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.01.021 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Mobbs D, Yu R, Meyer M, Passamonti L, Seymour B, Calder AJ, et al.. A key role for similarity in vicarious reward. Science. (2009) 324:900. 10.1126/science.1170539 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Corradi-Dell'Acqua C, Tusche A, Vuilleumier P, Singer T. Cross-modal representations of first-hand and vicarious pain, disgust and fairness in insular and cingulate cortex. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:10904. 10.1038/ncomms10904 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Corradi-Dell'Acqua C, Hofstetter C, Vuilleumier P. Felt and seen pain evoke the same local patterns of cortical activity in insular and cingulate cortex. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. (2011) 31:17996–8006. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2686-11.2011 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Oosterwijk S, Snoek L, Rotteveel M, Barrett LF, Scholte HS. Shared states: using MVPA to test neural overlap between self-focused emotion imagery and other-focused emotion understanding. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. (2017) 12:1025–35. 10.1093/scan/nsx037 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. Gallese V, Goldman A. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn Sci. (1998) 2:493–501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Gopnik A, Wellman HM. The theory theory. In: Hirschfeld LA, Gelman SA, editors. Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; (1995). p. 257–93. 10.1017/CBO9780511752902.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Frith C, Frith U. Theory of mind. Curr Biol CB. (2005) 15:R644–6. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.041 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Premack D, Woodruff G. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav Brain Sci. (1978) 1:515–26. 10.1017/S0140525X00076512 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Wimmer H, Perner J. Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition. (1983) 13:103–28. 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

19. Bzdok D, Schilbach L, Vogeley K, Schneider K, Laird AR, Langner R, et al.. Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy. Brain Struct Funct. (2012) 217:783–96. 10.1007/s00429-012-0380-y [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Shamay-Tsoory SG, Aharon-Peretz J, Perry D. Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain. (2009) 132:617–27. 10.1093/brain/awn279 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Schurz M, Radua J, Aichhorn M, Richlan F, Perner J. Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2014) 42:9–34. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Molenberghs P, Johnson H, Henry JD, Mattingley JB. Understanding the minds of others: a neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2016) 65:276–91. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.020 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Schaafsma SM, Pfaff DW, Spunt RP, Adolphs R. Deconstructing and reconstructing theory of mind. Trends Cogn Sci. (2015) 19:65–72. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.007 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Schurz M, Perner J. An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind. Front Psychol. (2015) 6:1610. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01610 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Kanske P, Böckler A, Trautwein F-M, Singer T. Dissecting the social brain: introducing the EmpaToM to reveal distinct neural networks and brain-behavior relations for empathy and theory of mind. NeuroImage. (2015) 122:6–19. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.082 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Wolf I, Dziobek I, Heekeren HR. Neural correlates of social cognition in naturalistic settings: a model-free analysis approach. NeuroImage. (2010) 49:894–904. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.060 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. Gallese V, Keysers C, Rizzolatti G. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. (2004) 8:396–403. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Jabbi M, Keysers C. Inferior frontal gyrus activity triggers anterior insula response to emotional facial expressions. Emotion. (2008) 8:775–80. 10.1037/a0014194 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Kanske P, Böckler A, Trautwein F-M, Parianen Lesemann FH, Singer T. Are strong empathizers better mentalizers? Evidence for independence and interaction between the routes of social cognition. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. (2016) 11:1383–92. 10.1093/scan/nsw052 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. Fonagy P, Luyten P. A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Dev Psychopathol. (2009) 21:1355–81. 10.1017/S0954579409990198 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Hutman T, Dapretto M. The emergence of empathy during infancy. Cogn Creier Comport Cogn Brain Behav. (2009) 13:367–90. [Google Scholar]

32. Decety J. The neural pathways, development and functions of empathy. Curr Opin Behav Sci. (2015) 3:1–6. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Tousignant B, Eugene F, Jackson PL. A developmental perspective on the neural bases of human empathy. Infant Behav Dev. (2017) 48:5–12. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.11.006 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Dondi M, Simion F, Caltran G. Can newborns discriminate between their own cry and the cry of another newborn infant? Dev Psychol. (1999) 35:418–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Knafo A, Zahn-Waxler C, Van Hulle C, Robinson JL, Rhee SH. The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: genetic and environmental contributions. Emotion. (2008) 8:737–52. 10.1037/a0014179 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. Roth-Hanania R, Davidov M, Zahn-Waxler C. Empathy development from 8 to 16 months: early signs of concern for others. Infant Behav Dev. (2011) 34:447–58. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.04.007 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Stern JA, Cassidy J. Empathy from infancy to adolescence: an attachment perspective on the development of individual differences. Dev Rev. (2018) 47:1–22. 10.1016/j.dr.2017.09.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

38. Uzefovsky F, Knafo-Noam A. Empathy development throughout the life span. In: Sommerville J, Decety J, editors. Social Cognition: Development Across the Life Span. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; (2017). p. 71–97. [Google Scholar]

39. Allemand M, Steiger AE, Fend HA. Empathy development in adolescence predicts social competencies in adulthood. J Pers. (2015) 83:229–41. 10.1111/jopy.12098 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

40. Wellman HM, Cross D, Watson J. Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Dev. (2001) 72:655–84. 10.1111/1467-8624.00304 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

41. Cadinu MR, Kiesner J. Children's development of a theory of mind. Eur J Psychol Educ. (2000) 15:93–111. 10.1007/BF03173169 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

42. Derksen DG, Hunsche MC, Giroux ME, Connolly DA, Bernstein DM. A systematic review of theory of mind's precursors and functions. Z Für Psychol. (2018) 226:87–97. 10.1027/2151-2604/a000325 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

43. Kovács ÁM, Téglás E, Endress AD. The social sense: susceptibility to others' beliefs in human infants and adults. Science. (2010) 330:1830–4. 10.1126/science.1190792 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

44. Slaughter V. Theory of mind in infants and young children: a review. Aust Psychol. (2015) 50:169–72. 10.1111/ap.12080 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

45. Setoh P, Scott RM, Baillargeon R. Two-and-a-half-year-olds succeed at a traditional false-belief task with reduced processing demands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2016) 113:13360–5. 10.1073/pnas.1609203113 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

46. Brown MM, Thibodeau RB, Pierucci JM, Gilpin AT. Supporting the development of empathy: the role of theory of mind and fantasy orientation. Soc Dev. (2017) 26:951–64. 10.1111/sode.12232 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

47. Reiter AMF, Kanske P, Eppinger B, Li S-C. The Aging of the social mind - differential effects on components of social understanding. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:11046. 10.1038/s41598-017-10669-4 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

48. Bailey PE, Henry JD, Von Hippel W. Empathy and social functioning in late adulthood. Aging Ment Health. (2008) 12:499–503. 10.1080/13607860802224243 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

49. Hühnel I, Fölster M, Werheid K, Hess U. Empathic reactions of younger and older adults: no age related decline in affective responding. J Exp Soc Psychol. (2014) 50:136–43. 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

50. Richter D, Kunzmann U. Age differences in three facets of empathy: performance-based evidence. Psychol Aging. (2011) 26:60–70. 10.1037/a0021138 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

51. El Haj M, Raffard S, Gély-Nargeot M-C. Destination memory and cognitive theory of mind in normal ageing. Memory. (2016) 24:526–34. 10.1080/09658211.2015.1021257 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

52. Henry JD, Phillips LH, Ruffman T, Bailey PE. A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind. Psychol Aging. (2013) 28:826–39. 10.1037/a0030677 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

53. Khanjani Z, Jeddi EM, Hekmati I, Khalilzade S, Nia ME, Andalib M, et al. Comparison of cognitive empathy, emotional empathy, and social functioning in different age groups. Aust Psychol. (2015) 50:80–5. 10.1111/ap.12099 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

54. Sze JA, Gyurak A, Goodkind MS, Levenson RW. Greater emotional empathy and prosocial behavior in late life. Emotion. (2012) 12:1129–40. 10.1037/a0025011 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

55. Ze O, Thoma P, Suchan B. Cognitive and affective empathy in younger and older individuals. Aging Ment Health. (2014) 18:929–35. 10.1080/13607863.2014.899973 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

56. Mossad SI, Smith ML, Pang EW, Taylor MJ. Neural correlates of “Theory of Mind” in very preterm born children. Hum Brain Mapp. (2017) 38:5577–89. 10.1002/hbm.23750 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

57. Pamela W. Garner. Child and family correlates of toddlers' emotional and behavioral responses to a mishap. Infant Ment Health J. (2003) 24:580–96. 10.1002/imhj.10076 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

58. Ebert S, Peterson C, Slaughter V, Weinert S. Links among parents' mental state language, family socioeconomic status, and preschoolers' theory of mind development. Cogn Dev. (2017) 44:32–48. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.08.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

59. Pratt M, Goldstein A, Levy J, Feldman R. Maternal depression across the first years of life impacts the neural basis of empathy in preadolescence. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2017) 56:20–9. 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.10.012 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

60. Tucker CJ, Updegraff KA, McHale SM, Crouter AC. Older siblings as socializers of younger siblings' empathy. J Early Adolesc. (1999) 19:176–98. 10.1177/0272431699019002003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

61. Ruffman T, Perner J, Naito M, Parkin L, Clements WA. Older (but not younger) siblings facilitate false belief understanding. Dev Psychol. (1998) 34:161–74. 10.1037/0012-1649.34.1.161 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

62. Liu D, Wellman HM, Tardif T, Sabbagh MA. Theory of mind development in Chinese children: a meta-analysis of false-belief understanding across cultures and languages. Dev Psychol. (2008) 44:523–31. 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.523 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

63. Shahaeian A, Nielsen M, Peterson CC, Slaughter V. Cultural and family influences on children's theory of mind development: a comparison of australian and Iranian school-age children. J Cross-Cult Psychol. (2014) 45:555–68. 10.1177/0022022113513921 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

64. Morelli SA, Lieberman MD, Zaki J. The emerging study of positive empathy: positive empathy. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. (2015) 9:57–68. 10.1111/spc3.12157 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

65. Beeney JE, Franklin RG, Levy KN, Adams RB. I feel your pain: emotional closeness modulates neural responses to empathically experienced rejection. Soc Neurosci. (2011) 6:369–76. 10.1080/17470919.2011.557245 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

66. Decety J. The neuroevolution of empathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2011) 1231:35–45. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06027.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

67. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL. Affiliation, empathy, and the origins of theory of mind. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2013) 110(Suppl. 2):10349–56. 10.1073/pnas.1301223110 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

68. Kirsch P. Oxytocin in the socioemotional brain: implications for psychiatric disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. (2015) 17:463–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

69. Tarrant M, Dazeley S, Cottom T. Social categorization and empathy for outgroup members. Br J Soc Psychol. (2009) 48:427–46. 10.1348/014466608X373589 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

70. Montalan B, Lelard T, Godefroy O, Mouras H. Behavioral investigation of the influence of social categorization on empathy for pain: a minimal group paradigm study. Front Psychol. (2012) 3:389. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00389 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

71. Kupferberg A, Bicks L, Hasler G. Social functioning in major depressive disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2016) 69:313–32. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.002 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

72. Hoffmann F, Banzhaf C, Kanske P, Gärtner M, Bermpohl F, Singer T. Empathy in depression: egocentric and altercentric biases and the role of alexithymia. J Affect Disord. (2016) 199:23–9. 10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.007 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

73. Mitchell IJ, Beck SR, Boyal A, Edwards VR. Theory of mind deficits following acute alcohol intoxication. Eur Addict Res. (2011) 17:164–8. 10.1159/000324871 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

74. Bora E, Berk M. Theory of mind in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. (2016) 191:49–55. 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.023 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

75. Berecz H, Tényi T, Herold R. Theory of mind in depressive disorders: a review of the literature. Psychopathology. (2016) 49:125–34. 10.1159/000446707 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

76. Raz G, Jacob Y, Gonen T, Winetraub Y, Flash T, Soreq E, et al.. Cry for her or cry with her: context-dependent dissociation of two modes of cinematic empathy reflected in network cohesion dynamics. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. (2014) 9:30–8. 10.1093/scan/nst052 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

77. Baez S, Flichtentrei D, Prats M, Mastandueno R, García AM, Cetkovich M, et al.. Men, women…who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition. PLOS ONE. (2017) 12:e0179336. 10.1371/journal.pone.0179336 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

78. Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty JP, Stephan KE, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature. (2006) 439:466–9. 10.1038/nature04271 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

79. Melchers MC, Li M, Haas BW, Reuter M, Bischoff L, Montag C. Similar personality patterns are associated with empathy in four different countries. Front Psychol. (2016) 7:290. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00290 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

80. Haas BW, Brook M, Remillard L, Ishak A, Anderson IW, Filkowski MM. I know how you feel: the warm-altruistic personality profile and the empathic brain. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e120639. 10.1371/journal.pone.0120639 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

81. Paulhus DL, Williams KM. The dark triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. J Res Personal. (2002) 36:556–63. 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

82. Wai M, Tiliopoulos N. The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personal Individ Differ. (2012) 52:794–9. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

83. Jones DN, Figueredo AJ. The core of darkness: uncovering the heart of the dark triad. Eur J Personal. (2013) 27:521–31. 10.1002/per.1893 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

84. Czarna AZ, Wróbel M, Dufner M, Zeigler-Hill V. Narcissism and emotional contagion: do narcissists “catch” the emotions of others? Soc Psychol Personal Sci. (2015) 6:318–24. 10.1177/1948550614559652 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

85. Giammarco EA, Vernon PA. Vengeance and the dark triad: the role of empathy and perspective taking in trait forgivingness. Personal Individ Differ. (2014) 67:23–9. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

86. Decety J, Skelly LR, Kiehl KA. Brain response to empathy-eliciting scenarios involving pain in incarcerated individuals with psychopathy. JAMA Psychiatry. (2013) 70:638–45. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.27 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

87. Winter K, Spengler S, Bermpohl F, Singer T, Kanske P. Social cognition in aggressive offenders: impaired empathy, but intact theory of mind. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:670. 10.1038/s41598-017-00745-0 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

88. Hepper EG, Hart CM, Sedikides C. Moving narcissus: can narcissists be empathic? Pers Soc Psychol Bull. (2014) 40:1079–91. 10.1177/0146167214535812 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

89. Lenzenweger MF, Clarkin JF, Caligor E, Cain NM, Kernberg OF. Malignant narcissism in relation to clinical change in borderline personality disorder: an exploratory study. Psychopathology. (2018) 51:318–25. 10.1159/000492228 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

90. Meffert H, Gazzola V, den Boer JA, Bartels AAJ, Keysers C. Reduced spontaneous but relatively normal deliberate vicarious representations in psychopathy. Brain J Neurol. (2013) 136:2550–62. 10.1093/brain/awt190 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

91. Krohn A. Borderline “empathy” and differentiation of object representations: a contribution to the psychology of object relations. Int J Psychoanal Psychother. (1974) 3:142–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

92. Dinsdale N, Crespi BJ. The borderline empathy paradox: evidence and conceptual models for empathic enhancements in borderline personality disorder. J Personal Disord. (2013) 27:172–95. 10.1521/pedi.2013.27.2.172 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

93. Fertuck EA, Jekal A, Song I, Wyman B, Morris MC, Wilson ST, et al. Enhanced “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” in borderline personality disorder compared to healthy controls. Psychol Med. (2009) 39:1979–88. 10.1017/S003329170900600X [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

94. Lucas-Molina B, Pérez-Albéniz A, Ortuño-Sierra J. Dimensional structure and measurement invariance of the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) across gender. Psicothema. (2017) 29:590–5. 10.7334/psicothema2017.19 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

95. Nettle D, Liddle B. Agreeableness is related to social-cognitive, but not social-perceptual, theory of mind. Eur J Personal. (2008) 22:323–35. 10.1002/per.672 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

96. Jonason PK, Krause L. The emotional deficits associated with the dark triad traits: cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and alexithymia. Personal Individ Differ. (2013) 55:532–7. 10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.027 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

97. Drayton LA, Santos LR, Baskin-Sommers A. Psychopaths fail to automatically take the perspective of others. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2018) 115:3302–7. 10.1073/pnas.1721903115 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

98. Konrath S, Corneille O, Bushman BJ, Luminet O. The relationship between narcissistic exploitativeness, dispositional empathy, and emotion recognition abilities. J Nonverbal Behav. (2014) 38:129–43. 10.1007/s10919-013-0164-y [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

99. Nagler UKJ, Reiter KJ, Furtner MR, Rauthmann JF. Is there a “dark intelligence”? Emotional intelligence is used by dark personalities to emotionally manipulate others. Personal Individ Differ. (2014) 65:47–52. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.025 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

100. Feshbach ND. Empathy in children: some theoretical and empirical considerations. Couns Psychol. (1975) 5:25–30. 10.1177/001100007500500207 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

101. Zaki J. Moving beyond stereotypes of empathy. Trends Cogn Sci. (2017) 21:59–60. 10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.004 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

102. Singer T, Lamm C. The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2009) 1156:81–96. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

103. Decety J, Jackson PL. The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. (2004) 3:71–100. 10.1177/1534582304267187 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

104. Healey ML, Grossman M. Cognitive and affective perspective-taking: evidence for shared and dissociable anatomical substrates. Front Neurol. (2018) 9:491. 10.3389/fneur.2018.00491 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

105. Cuff BMP, Brown SJ, Taylor L, Howat DJ. Empathy: a review of the concept. Emot Rev. (2016) 8:144–53. 10.1177/1754073914558466 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

106. Steins G. Diagnosis of empathy and perspective-taking: a review of the relation between these constructs and implications for their measurement. Diagnostica. (1998) 44:117–29. [Google Scholar]

107. Bottiroli S, Cavallini E, Ceccato I, Vecchi T, Lecce S. Theory of mind in aging: comparing cognitive and affective components in the faux pas test. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2016) 62:152–62. 10.1016/j.archger.2015.09.009 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

108. Valk SL, Bernhardt BC, Trautwein F-M, Böckler A, Kanske P, Guizard N, et al.. Structural plasticity of the social brain: differential change after socio-affective and cognitive mental training. Sci Adv. (2017) 3:e1700489. 10.1126/sciadv.1700489 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

109. Trautwein F-M, Kanske P, Böckler-Raettig A, Singer T. Differential benefits of mental training types for attention, compassion, and theory of mind. (2017) 8:1488–512. 10.31234/osf.io/k5dqb [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

How is perspective related to empathy?

Does empathy require perspective

Is cognitive empathy the same as perspective

How does empathy help us understand other perspectives?