Which inventory costing method uses the newest cost for cost of goods sold?

So if your business operates internationally, you might want to look at other inventory costing methods.

The GAAP does not mention LIFO, but it does not prohibit its use.

So if your business is exclusively operating within the US, it’s okay to use LIFO.

FIFO (First In, First Out)

FIFO assumes that a business sells its oldest goods first before selling the new ones.

It also assumes that not all inventory is equal in cost.

The goods that you produced or purchased a month ago may cost less than their today counterparts.

Under this method, the cost of the oldest goods greatly determines the cost of goods sold.

For example, let’s say that you own a business that sells sunglasses.

You purchased 10 sunglasses on April 4 for your starting inventory.

On April 15, you bought another 10 sunglasses.

On April 28, a customer bought 5 sunglasses from you.

Under FIFO, we assume that the oldest goods are sold first.

So the cost of the 5 sunglasses that you sold is determined by the cost of the sunglasses you bought on April 4.

If those glasses cost $5 each, then your cost of goods sold will be $25.

This pattern will continue until you sell or dispose of all your oldest goods.

After that, the cost of the next oldest goods will determine the cost of goods sold.

The FIFO method is best suited for businesses that sell their oldest goods first before the newer ones.

It could be because of preference or necessity.

Logically, businesses that sell perishable goods or goods that can become outdated would want to sell their oldest goods first.

You cannot reasonably sell expired products.

And goods that have become outdated are usually sold at a lower price than they would normally sell for.

That said, FIFO is not exclusive to these kinds of businesses.

It’s popular, mostly because of its simplicity and intuitiveness.

In fact, it is the IRS’s default inventory costing method.

If you don’t specify your inventory costing method, the IRS will assume that you’re using FIFO.

Which inventory costing method uses the newest cost for cost of goods sold?
Which inventory costing method uses the newest cost for cost of goods sold?

Pros and Cons of FIFO

PROS

  • You don’t have to perform complicated computations. The cost of inventory and the cost of goods sold are determined by actual costs
  • The valuation of inventory is based on the age of the inventory you’re holding
  • Popular because of its simplicity and intuitiveness
  • Easy to apply as long as you have proper recording of inventory
  • Can result in higher immediate profits as the cost of older goods are usually lower than their newer counterparts

CONS

  • Can result in higher taxes due to the lower cost of goods sold
  • High price variance can cause overstatement or understatement in inventory valuations
  • Budgeting may become challenging if inventory costs are constantly changing
  • The cost of goods sold may not be representative of the current prices/cost of the product

LIFO (Last In, First Out)

LIFO is the conceptual opposite of LIFO.

It assumes that a business will sell its newest goods first before it sells its older ones.

Just like FIFO, it also assumes that the cost of all inventory is not always equal.

Usually, the cost of goods today is higher than their cost a month ago.

Under this method, the cost of the newest goods greatly determines the cost of goods sold.

For example, let’s go back to the imaginary sunglasses business you have above.

Remember on April 28, a customer bought 5 of your sunglasses?

Under LIFO, the cost of those glasses is determined by your newest stocks.

Meaning that the cost of the glasses you bought on April 14 will determine the cost of goods sold.

If those glasses cost $6 each, then your cost of goods sold will be $30.

One of LIFO’s benefits is that it uses the most recent inventory to determine your cost of goods sold.

It’s usually easier to extract information about your newest stocks than your older ones.

Another benefit of LIFO is that it usually results in a higher cost of goods sold.

This ultimately translates to a lower net income, meaning lower income taxes.

In actual practice, LIFO is rarely used.

There’s rarely a good reason to sell the newest inventory over the oldest ones.

Additionally, if your business operates internationally, do note that the IFRS does not recognize LIFO as a valid inventory costing method.

That said, while the GAAP does mention LIFO as one of the inventory costing methods, it does not prohibit its use.

So if your business exclusively operates within the US, then LIFO is still an option for you.

You’ll need to seek permission from the IRS first before you can use LIFO though.

Which inventory costing method uses the newest cost for cost of goods sold?
Which inventory costing method uses the newest cost for cost of goods sold?

Pros and Cons of LIFO

PROS

  • You don’t have to perform complicated computations. The cost of inventory and the cost of goods sold are determined by actual costs
  • LIFO uses the most recent cost of inventory for your cost of goods sold
  • Can result in a higher cost of goods sold which ultimately translates to lower income taxes

CONS

  • High price variance can cause overstatement or understatement in inventory valuations
  • Budgeting may become challenging if inventory costs are constantly changing
  • Is not recognized by the IFRS as a valid inventory costing method
  • Allowed under GAAP, but requires permission from the IRS

Weighted Average Costing (WAC)

The weighted average costing method is unlike the previous two methods that uses the cost of the newest or oldest goods for inventory valuation.

Instead, WAC uses the whole inventory for inventory valuation.

It averages the price of all inventory to determine the cost of goods sold.

It does this by dividing the cost of goods available for sale by the number of units available for sale.

This is particularly useful if you want to have your costs averaged out over time, rather than using actual costs like LIFO or FIFO.

Here’s an illustration of how WAC works:

Which inventory costing method uses the newest cost for cost of goods sold?
Which inventory costing method uses the newest cost for cost of goods sold?

As can be seen from above, the WAC changes whenever there’s an increase in inventory.

This happens when the per-unit cost of purchased goods is not equal to the WAC.

The cost of goods sold is determined by the WAC on the date of sale.

For example, the cost of goods sold on August 9 amounted to $20.12 per unit, which is the WAC on the same date.

The WAC method is best suited for inventories that have almost identical products.

It can also be used when it’s more costly than beneficial to assign specific costs to each item.

And while there is computation involved, it’s still one of the easiest methods of inventory costing.

You only need to use one formula after all.

That said, this method isn’t suited for goods that aren’t equal, more particularly in costs.

If there is a high variance in prices, using the WAC method might be more harmful than beneficial.

It can cause an overstatement or understatement of inventory valuation.

So if you’re dealing with goods that greatly vary in price, you might want to reconsider using the WAC method.

Pros and Cons of the WAC method

PROS

  • Averages the cost of inventory over time. You don’t have to rely on actual costs
  • Only uses one formula, so it’s easy to use. Can be applied and utilized immediately
  • Lessens the effect of differences in cost of stocks as the WAC method averages them out

CONS

  • Not suitable for goods that vary greatly in price
  • If a large volume of inventory is purchased when the cost per unit is significantly or lower than the WAC, there would be a great effect on the new WAC. This may result in an overstated or understated inventory valuation
  • Can be the most difficult inventory costing method to correct if there are any costing mistakes or errors. The impact of a single adjustment can affect many inventory entries, especially if the error was detected very late

Specific Identification

The specific identification method meticulously assigns a cost for each unit of inventory.

This method of inventory costing requires more effort as you need to keep track of the cost of each unit of product.

The trade-off is that you can have a more accurate recording of inventory costs.

Determining the cost of goods is pretty simple.

Whatever is the assigned cost of the sold product will be its cost of sale.

For example, my inventory is currently composed of three units of products: A, B, and C.

Product A is assigned a cost of $25, product B $21, and product C $29.

A customer chose to buy product A.

What do you think my cost of goods sold would be?

If your answer is $25, then you get the basics of specific identification method.

This method is more suited for businesses that have a low volume of sales but have products that greatly vary in price.

It can also be suited for businesses that only produce and sell personalized products.

That said, it’s virtually impossible to use for businesses that have a high volume of sales.

It’s costly, both in effort and time, to keep track of the thousand, even millions of units of inventory.

The benefits you get from using this method do not make up for it.

If you decide to use this inventory costing method, make sure to perform inventory counting regularly.

This is to account for theft or spoilage, as well as prevent them.

Which inventory costing method uses the newest cost for cost of goods sold?
Which inventory costing method uses the newest cost for cost of goods sold?

Pros and Cons of the Specific Identification method

PROS

  • Can result in more accurate inventory valuation
  • Suited for businesses that sell products that vastly differ from each other

CONS

  • Requires more time and effort than the other inventory costing methods
  • Not suited for businesses that have high volumes of sales

Article Sources & Citations

FundsNet requires Contributors, Writers and Authors to use Primary Sources to source and cite their work. These Sources include White Papers, Government Information & Data, Original Reporting and Interviews from Industry Experts. Reputable Publishers are also sourced and cited where appropriate. Learn more about the standards we follow in producing Accurate, Unbiased and Researched Content in our editorial policy.

Which inventory costing method uses the newest cost for cost of goods sold on the income statement?

Last in, first out (LIFO) is another inventory costing method a company can use to value the cost of goods sold. This method is the opposite of FIFO. Instead of selling its oldest inventory first, companies that use the LIFO method sell its newest inventory first.

Which inventory costing method uses the newest cost of cost of goods sold on the income statement and the oldest cost of inventory on the balance sheet?

The FIFO (“First-In, First-Out”) method means that the cost of a company's oldest inventory is used in the COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) calculation. LIFO (“Last-In, First-Out”) means that the cost of a company's most recent inventory is used instead.

Which method of inventory costing will produce the lowest cost of goods sold?

During periods of inflation, the use of FIFO will result in the lowest estimate of cost of goods sold among the three approaches, and the highest net income.

Is COGS higher in FIFO or LIFO?

LIFO: Higher COGS, lower Net Income, and a lower ending Inventory balance. FIFO: Lower COGS, higher Net Income, and a higher ending Inventory balance.