Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core m3-6Y30 on one side and the Intel Pentium E5300 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.4GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page. Specification comparison:Processor Intel Core m3-6Y30 Intel Pentium E5300Market (main)Notebook DesktopISAx86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)MicroarchitectureSkylake PenrynCore nameSkylake-Y Wolfdale-3MFamilyCore m3 Pentium 5000Part number(s), S-Spec HE8066201930521, SR2EN BX80571E5300, BXC80571E5300, AT80571PG0642M, AT80571PG0642ML, QJLN, SLB9U, SLGQ6, SLGTL Release dateQ3 2015 Q1 2008Lithography14 nm 45 nmTransistors1,750,000,000 228,000,000Cores2 2Threads4 2Base frequency900 MHz 2.6 GHzTurbo frequency2.4 GHz -High performance cores 2 Cores 4 Threads @ 0.9 / 2.4 GHz - Cache memory4 MB 2 MBMax memory capacity16 GB 4 GBMemory types LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 DDR2-SDRAM Max PCIe lanes10 16TDP5 W 65 WSuggested PSU- 600W ATX Power Supply  AES New Instructions, Secure Key - Security Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, Execute Disable Bit, OS Guard - Max display resolution 4096 x 2304@24Hz (HDMI), 3840 x 2160@60Hz (DP), 3840 x 2160@60Hz (eDP) - CPU-Z single thread179 175CPU-Z multi thread571 346Cinebench R15 single thread90 100Cinebench R15 multi-thread199 196PassMark single thread1,172 1,030PassMark CPU Mark1,901 904(Windows) Geekbench 4 single core2,475 1,459(Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core4,641 2,331(SGEMM) GFLOPS Performance69.6 GFLOPS 25.5 GFLOPS(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio1,031 pts / W 36 pts / WAmazon Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. Suggested PSU: We assume that we have an ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc. Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Pentium E5300 is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Core m3-6Y30 is lower. The Intel Core m3-6Y30 was designed earlier. Performance comparison with the benchmarks:Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench. CPU-Z - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score Intel Core m3-6Y30 In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 65%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results. CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread. Cinebench R15 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score Intel Core m3-6Y30 In single core, the difference is -10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results. Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points. PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread Intel Core m3-6Y30 In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 110%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results. PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity. With Windows: Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows Intel Core m3-6Y30 In single core, the difference is 70%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 99%. With Linux: Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux Intel Core m3-6Y30 In single core, the difference is 161%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 239%. With Mac OS X: Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Mac OS X Intel Core m3-6Y30 In single core, the difference is 64%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 88%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results. Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software. |
