Show
Tests of Controls are audit procedures performed to test the operating effectiveness of controls in preventing or detecting material misstatements at the relevant assertion level. A test of controls is an audit procedure to test the effectiveness of a control used by a client entity to prevent or detect material misstatements. Substantive testing is the stage of an audit when the auditor gathers evidence as to the extent of misstatements in client’s accounting records or other information. These tests are required as confirmation to maintain the declaration that the financial records of an entity are complete, applicable, and correct. Differentiate between the terms ‘Test of Control’ and ‘Substantive Tests’ Test of Control
Substantive Test
More PostLatest Post➤ The terms are used interchangeably, but technically, substantive testing procedures include test of details and analytical procedures. Test of details relates to obtaining source documentation and reconciling, tracing, vouching, etc. Analytical procedures relate more to using financial and nonfinancial information to derive expected balances and comparing to the actually reported balance. Substantive Procedures:Substantive procedures are performed to detect material misstatements at the relevant assertion level, and include tests of details of classes of transactions, account balances, and disclosures and substantive analytical procedures. The auditor should plan and perform substantive procedures to be responsive to the related assessment of the risk of material misstatement. In order to effectively determine appropriate substantive procedures, the auditor should understand the nature, extent, and timing of their respective applicability. Nature – Substantive procedures include tests of details and substantive analytical procedures. Substantive analytical procedures are generally more applicable to large volumes of transactions that tend to be predictable over time. Extent – The greater the risk of material misstatement, the less detection risk that can be accepted; consequently, the greater the extent of substantive procedures. Because the risk of material misstatement includes consideration of the effectiveness of internal control, the extent of substantive procedures may be reduced by satisfactory results from tests of the operating effectiveness of controls. Timing – In some circumstances, substantive procedures may be performed at an interim date. When substantive procedures are performed at an interim date, the auditor should perform further substantive procedures or substantive procedures combined with tests of controls to cover the remaining period that provide a reasonable basis for extending the audit conclusions from the interim date to the period end. If you are studying for the CPA exam, then sign up for a free trial to have full access to the Universal CPA platform for 7 days here. Universal CPA is the only course that has visual learning and bite-sized video explanations for every single MCQ and simulation. To learn more about the Universal CPA course and see a demo of the course, visit this link. The purpose of audit testsThe purpose of audit tests, or audit procedures, is to allow the auditor to collect sufficient appropriate audit evidence to be able to conclude with reasonable assurance that the financial statements (FS) are free of material misstatement. If sufficient appropriate audit evidence cannot be obtained, or the evidence points to a material misstatement in the FS, the auditor will have to issue a modified audit opinion. Misstatements will find their way into published financial statements only if three events all happen:
There are therefore two lines of defence preventing an error that has occurred from ending up in the published FS: the internal control system and the work auditor carries out. If the client’s internal control system is good, there is a reduced likelihood that there will be an error in the FS and the auditor will reduce the amount of audit work to be carried out. If the internal control system is poor, the auditor will have to perform much more work as the audit is the only defence left against a material misstatement appearing in the published FS. Therefore, the auditor must:
Consider the receivables amount in the SOFP. One way in which this could be misstated would be if it were incorrectly valued, perhaps because a large balance was owed by a customer who was unlikely to pay. The controls that would help to prevent that include:
The operation of these controls needs to be tested. For example:
Each of these audit tests are testing a control or control procedure. They are therefore tests of control. These tests are not investigating the receivables balance in the SOFP. I repeat, a test of control tests controls, not amounts in the FS. Tests of control can be grouped into:Enquiry and confirmation. For example, ask the credit controller about the way in which customers are encouraged to pay and ask how these customers are identified and how often they are followed up. This is a relatively weak source of evidence because the credit controller might exaggerate his or her efforts. Inspection. For example, the credit references or notes made by the credit controller of conversations. Observation. For example, observing the credit controller at work. Recalculation and reperformance. For example, ensuring that the aged receivables analysis seems to be accurate. Even when internal control systems are very good, the auditor will always carry out tests on the figures in the FS. The work has to address all the assertions made by each material figure. For example, valuation, completeness, existence etc. These tests are substantive tests and consist of:
So, staying with receivables, the auditor would calculate the receivables collection period. If this were not too large and broadly in line with previous periods, the auditor would have gained some evidence about valuation (ie most debts not very old). Tests of detail would include:
Substantive tests therefore include analytical procedures in addition to the four classes of audit procedures available for testing controls, so giving the well-known mnemonic AEIOU: Analytical procedures Enquiry and confirmation Inspection Observation RecalcUlation and reperformance Remember if the tests of control show that controls are not operating correctly, the auditor will have to increase the substantive tests. For example, if the client does little to assess customers’ credit worthiness to ensure, as far as possible, that debts are recoverable, the auditor will have to do much more work on the receivables figure in the SOFP to be satisfied that the amount is valued at a true and fair amount. What is the difference between a substantive test of transactions and a test of details of balances?The terms are used interchangeably, but technically, substantive testing procedures include test of details and analytical procedures. Test of details relates to obtaining source documentation and reconciling, tracing, vouching, etc.
What is the difference between test of controls and test of details?While a test of controls supports control risk assessment, a test of details is performed to support the overall audit opinion of a company's balance sheet and accompanying transactions. Tests of control are only performed when the auditor believes that the control risk is low, enabling them to verify this assessment.
What is the difference between substantive test and test of details?As you can see, a test of details is just what it says it is. You are digging into the details of transactions. Substantive analytics, by contrast, look at numbers from a broader perspective. For example, the auditor might compute the current ratio or compare this year's debt level with prior years.
What are substantive tests of transactions in auditing?Substantive testing is known as the phase of an audit where the auditor gathers samples to identify any material misstatements in the client's accounting records or other information. This proof is required to support the judgment that a company's financial records are complete, relevant, and accurate.
|