Where does the most money spent on health care go?

It's one thing to talk about the massive amount of money, trillions of dollars, that get spent every year in the US health care system. In 1997, that number was $1.5 trillion; in 2012, it had risen to $2.8 trillion, and health care spending as a share of GDP had increased by an absolute 4%. Last year, about one in every six dollars contributed to GDP was spent on health care.

But merely reciting the numbers makes it sound like it's easy to cut. As I've said many times on our blog, though, one person's waste is another person's income. One in seven American workers is employed in the health care sector.

Where does all that money go, though? Last month, Sherry Glied, Stephanie Ma, and Claudia Solis-Roman published a paper in Health Affairs that gets at exactly that question. They used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Economic Census, from 1997, 2002, 2007, and 2012, and combined that with data from the Economic Census’s annual industry accounts. This allowed them to get some pretty detailed answers on health care revenue, costs, and expenses.

In 2012, revenues exceeded expenses by 10.2%. Half of this revenue went to workers. Almost half of all labor compensation went to physicians and nurses (23%); other health care practitioners and support staff (12%); and management, administration, and information technology staff (14.9%). More than a third of the total revenue went toward purchasing intermediate goods and services.

Labor costs have declined over time, though. From 53.2% of revenue in 1997 to 49.8% in 2012. That decline was sharpest in hospitals (54.1% to 48.8%).

One thing that fascinated me was the change in the workforce. In 1997, one in every 17.8 people working in the three major subsectors was a doctor. But by 2012, that increased to one in every 16.6 people. The number of employed doctors grew by nearly a third, which was faster than the growth of the entire healthcare sector (24.5%). For all of the talk of the doctor shortage (which I will explore in detail at a later date), we seem to have been adding physicians to the system at an improved clip.

Additionally, for all the complaints of doctors about reimbursement, inflation-adjusted earnings for doctors outpaced both the health care sector overall and the economy at large, rising by more than 35% over the studied period. Nurses also increased in number (33.2% over the study period), which was three times as much as the 11.3% increase in total US employment over the same period. Their inflation-adjusted earnings increased by more than 30% as well. If you combine employment growth with the increase in earnings, the share of total revenue paid to doctors and nurses grew by more than 80% over the study period.

Still, an even more rapid increase in employment happened in health care support positions, like aides and assistants, which grew by more than 53%. Growth in physicians' offices more than doubled. IT positions also increased rapidly, by more than two thirds. But since IT comprised so little in overall numbers in 1997, the total numbers in 2012 are still relatively small.

There are much more data in the actual paper, and I encourage you to go read it in full. But the overall picture leads the authors to suggest that health care spending had been influenced by a number of factors, including changes in regulations and the market, trends in the economy, and the changing and expanding role of technology. While payments from insurers have decreased, providers have adjusted expenses to compensate, pretty well in fact. Labor as a share of revenue has declined, though, as goods and services, especially technology, have increased as a share of expenses. Their conclusion:

Changes in the health care sector—including the development of new delivery systems and the introduction of new technologies—are likely to alter where the money in the sector goes and who receives how much of it in the future. Monitoring these aggregates therefore serves as a useful corollary to studies of specific reforms and a necessary element in sensible policy design.

Aaron

Blog comments are restricted to AcademyHealth members only. To add comments, please sign-in.

Where does the most money spent on health care go?
The Global Health Expenditure Database (GHED) provides comparable data on health expenditure for 192 countries over the past 20 years. Health spending indicators are key guides for monitoring resource, provision of transparency and supporting the accountability of health fynansing systems. The present time series, from 2000 to 2019, up to the COVID-19 pandemic period, provide a basis for assessing future changes in health systems. They also support the goal of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) by helping monitor the availability of resources for health. The published data stimulate further research and discussion of health policy at the global, regional and national levels, as well as improving the data availability and quality. The database is open access and contributes to a better understanding of:

WHO works collaboratively with Member States and updates the data base (Explore the Data) annually using available information such as health accounts data, government expenditure records and official statistics. Where necessary, modifications and estimates are made to ensure the comprehensiveness and consistency of the data across countries and years.

Alongside the data, we are also pleased to announce the update of individual country profiles. In the documentation center, you will find the December 2021 country release note, as well as complimentary technical notes, methodology guidelines, global, regional and country reports on health expenditure, metadata documentation, and the data availability information.

Together with the data publication, we also released the annual report “Global Expenditure on Health: Public Spending on the Rise?”. This new report examines country health spending patterns and trends over the past 20 years, before the COVID-19 pandemic, with greater focus on public spending on health. The report also presents spending on primary health care, preliminary health expenditure in 2020 for a small set of countries (including their health spending on COVID-19) and an analysis of high income countries spending patterns, in particular during the global financial crisis. The report also points out the need for more public investment in health to get progress towards UHC back on track and strong health security.

We renew our commitment to work closely with countries and partners to advocate the global health expenditure database as a global public good; evidence-informed policy making processes, and promote transparency and accountability among stakeholders on the road to UHC and health security.

Where is the most money spent in healthcare?

Health consumption expenditures per capita, U.S. dollars, PPP adjusted, 2020 or nearest year.
United States. $11,945..
Switzerland. $7,138..
Germany. $6,731..
Netherlands. $6,299..
Austria. $5,899..
Sweden. $5,754..
Comparable Country Average. $5,736..
France. $5,564..

What is the biggest expense in healthcare?

Overall Costs of Healthcare.
Hospital care (31%).
Physician services (20%).
Prescription drugs (10%).
Other personal healthcare costs (5%).
Nursing care facilities (5%).
Dental services (4%).
Home healthcare (3%).
Other professional services (3%).

Who pays the most for healthcare in the world?

There are several reasons things that may factor into higher health care costs in the U.S., from high drug costs to extensive administrative fees. The fact remains that The United States spends at least 40% more on health care per person than any other country in the world.

Where does America's healthcare money go?

Where Does the Money Go? Most federal health care resources go toward financing four items: Medicare, Medicaid, the tax exclusion for employer-sponsored health insurance, and the exchange subsidies established under the Affordable Care Act. These and other programs are discussed below.