The idea of an inalienable right is at the heart of U.S. democracy — a right that people are born with and that can never be taken away. Show Religious freedom is one of them. “Our Founders understood religious freedom not as the state’s creation, but as the gift of God to every person and a fundamental right for a flourishing society,” Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in May when he released the .
The concept is so important that the State Department will bring together foreign ministers, religious leaders, religious rights activists and civil society figures in Washington on July 24–26 for the first-ever ministerial meeting on religious freedom. The meeting intends to break new ground. “We look forward to identifying concrete ways to push back against persecution and ensure greater respect for religious freedom for all,” Pompeo said. In the U.S., religious freedom is sometimes called the First Freedom, because it is the first freedom enumerated in the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.  An inalienable right, said Richard Foltin of the Freedom Forum Institute, is “a right that can’t be restrained or repealed by human laws.” Sometimes called natural rights, inalienable rights “flow from our nature as free people.” While there are important rights held by Americans and other citizens of democracies around the world that are not considered inalienable — such as the right to a trial by jury and even the right to own property — the most important are inalienable because they cannot be given or taken away by a government. Instead, it is a government’s job to protect inalienable rights. But for far too many people, Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom Sam Brownback said, “the state of religious freedom is dire. We have to work together to accomplish change.” “Our goal is to protect the freedom of conscience for all people,” Brownback said at the May event with the secretary. “That means protecting a Muslim, Buddhist, Falun Gong practitioner or Christian in China and their ability to pray and live out their life.” The Declaration of Independence makes a profound statement about the role of civil government. Our founders came to view a civil government quite differently than the then philosophy of government in England where the king ruled people with a consolidation of powers. Because of different reforms such as the Magna Carta (1215), and the influence of men like Edward Coke and John Locke our founders saw the potential abuses in the “divine right of kings” philosophy. The architects of the American philosophy recognized the importance of certain individual rights that are connected to a person’s humanity, not granted by the government. Since the Creator is the giver of life, these rights come from the Creator, not from kings or other categories of civil rulers. With respect to these unalienable rights, our founders thought the civil government should be the protector of those rights rather than individuals being their own judge, jury, and executioner. Yet, the founders stated in the Declaration of Independence that it was the people who should choose those to whom they would entrust the duty to protect their unalienable rights. “That to secure these rights,” is the phrase used in the Declaration of Independence to describe the civil government’s duty with respect to the unalienable gifts from the Creator, which are unalienable rights among men. “To secure” does not mean to define, limit, expand, or to eliminate. It means to protect, remove from danger, and make safe. To secure something presupposes it already preexists and who secures it is not the source of its existence. Thus, we see that certain rights are “unalienable” because they preexist civil government, having come from the Creator, not man. To secure unalienable rights means to affirm these rights by passing laws and providing police protection. It also means to provide remedies to those who have been deprived of their unalienable rights. Without a method of enforcement and consequences for disobedience, a law is nothing more than a statement of moral value or advice. Our founders knew what “secure” meant and knew that the functions of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government were to focus on protecting and serving the people by securing their unalienable rights. Even without a legal background, it is easy to understand that our laws against murder and other bodily injury, laws against theft, and laws against burglary are all there to protect unalienable rights. In England and in the early history of our country, these crimes were call “common law crimes” because everyone knew they were wrong as infringing upon the unalienable rights of another, but there was no criminal statute that declared them as crimes. Even though there was no statute saying that murder was wrong, a person could be convicted of common law murder because the evil of murder was common knowledge based upon the laws of nature. Today, we do not have any common law crimes because they all have been declared wrong by statute, but the purpose of laws against such crimes has not changed—they are there to secure the unalienable rights of individuals. What are unalienable rights?The unalienable rights are those which can never be taken away, either voluntarily or involuntarily. These ideas were first articulated in the Enlightenment, which was a movement from the 16th through 18th centuries focused on challenging tradition and discovering universal truths.
What are the 3 characteristics of unalienable rights?Natural rights are often considered unalienable, meaning that are not to be taken away or denied. English philosopher John Locke believed that “Life, Liberty, and Property were the most important natural rights.
What is an unalienable right quizlet?rights that cannot be denied.
Who defined unalienable rights?History of the idea of “inalienable Rights.” One key to understanding “inalienable” rights (as distinguished from ordinary, “alienable” rights) is found by turning to one of Thomas Jefferson's rough drafts of the Declaration of Independence.
|
